|
Academic Honesty and Plagiarism
Academic
Integrity (Harvard University Policy)
The following
standards relate to all work prepared for evaluation by course instructors
(i.e., homework, take-home exams, in-class examinations, presentations
and papers). Students are required to submit such work for evaluation
for various reasons:
- To help the students develop and cogently express concepts, knowledge,
and skills
- To inspire creative thinking and work
- To provide
the instructor with feedback revealing whether or not students grasp
the material presented
- To provide
a record of the student's progress
- To promote
the learning of new material and to reinforce old material
Harvard
University students are expected to adhere to the following guidelines
regarding academic standards and behavior. There is no intention to discourage
interactions among students, faculty, and others. Exchanges among students
are invaluable, especially in this school where the diversity of backgrounds
and experience is so rich and varied. Nevertheless, these guidelines emphasize
the need for attributing credit and for doing independent work when required
by the instructor.
All work
submitted to meet course requirements is expected to be a student's own
work. In the preparation of work submitted to meet course requirements,
students should always take great care to distinguish their own ideas
and knowledge from information derived from sources. Whenever ideas or
facts are derived from a student's reading and research the sources must
be indicated. The term "sources" includes not only published
primary and secondary material, but also information and opinions gained
directly from other people. The responsibility for using the proper forms
of citation lies with the individual student. Quotations must be placed
within quotation marks, and the source must be credited. All paraphrased
material also must be completely acknowledged.
A computer
program written to satisfy a course requirement is, like a paper, expected
to be the original work of the student submitting it. Copying a program
from another student or from any other source is a form of academic dishonesty,
as is deriving a program substantially from the work of others.
The amount
of collaboration with others that is permitted in the completion of assignments
can vary, depending upon the policy set by the course instructor. Students
must assume that collaboration in the completion of assignments is prohibited
unless explicitly specified by the instructor. Students must acknowledge
any collaboration and its extent in all submitted work. This requirement
applies to collaboration on editing as well as collaboration on substance.
Unless otherwise
specified, take-home examinations are given with the understanding that
students may consult notes and references, but not other students. Students
who submit work either not their own or without clear attribution of its
sources may be subject to disciplinary action including the possibility
of being required to withdraw from the School.
A paper
or other work normally is submitted to only one course. If the same or
substantially the same work is subsequently submitted to any other course,
the prior written permission of the instructor involved must be obtained.
A student who submits the same or substantially the same work for more
than one course without such prior permission may be subject to disciplinary
action including the possibility of being required to withdraw from the
School. (CEP 1/86. Adapted from the Handbook for Students, Harvard
College, 1984-85.)
Students
also should be aware that HSPH has instituted procedures for the administration
of examinations. Depending on the size of the class, proctors may be used
to monitor examinations, and students may be asked to follow a certain
seating arrangement. Before the examination, the instructor or proctor
will explain any particular procedures to be followed.
These examples
are not meant to be exhaustive, and the School reserves the right to determine,
in a given instance, what action constitutes an infringement of academic
honesty and integrity. The Office for Students and academic departments
actively attempt to inform students of the requirements of academic honesty
through orientation programs and publications and will investigate vigorously
complaints of academic dishonesty (see Disciplinary Procedures).
|
Policies on Academic Honesty: To help clarify and bring home the full import of these policies I have compiled a number of resources which provide both a more detailed discussion of the issue of plagiarism as well as guidance for the citing of sources.
- WHAT IS PLAGIARISM? A closer look from Kansas State University and Harvard University.
- EXAMPLES OF PLAGIARISM Examples of plagiarism from Princeton University and Dartmouth College.
- HOW TO CITE SOURCES
A set of guidelines from Professor McAfee's Class Notes showing "you how to quote from the texts you read in class and find on the internet and (briefly) how to cite primary and secondary materials for philosophy papers." A good, concise set of links..
- QUOTING, PARAPHRASING, AND SUMMARIZING. Owl Handout "intended to help you become more comfortable with the uses of and distinctions among quotations,
paraphrases, and summaries. The first part of the handout compares and contrasts the terms, while the second part offers a
short excerpt that you can use to practice these skills."
This document is part of a collection of instructional materials used in the Purdue University Writing Lab. The online
version is part of OWL (Online Writing Lab), a project of the Purdue University Writing Lab, funded by the School of
Liberal Arts at Purdue.
- CITING SOURCES FROM THE INTERNET. "The Internet is a widely-used tool for research, but unfortunately, style manuals contain little information on how to
document electronic sources. This page contains links to sources which will help students, teachers, and anybody doing
research on the Internet to cite such sources using different styles. Some links come from "Cyber Citations," an article by
Michael A. Arnzen, which appeared in Internet World in September 1996. Some of the addresses were no longer
current and are updated here, and many more have been added.
Two main documentation styles used in the U.S.A. are MLA (the Modern Language Association) and APA (the
American Psychological Association). The MLA style is used in the humanities, and the APA in the natural and social
sciences. Full instructions for MLA and APA styles, including updated instructions for citing electronic sources, are
available on the [site]." This document is part of a collection of instructional materials used in the Purdue University Writing Lab. The on-line version is part of OWL (On-line Writing Lab), a project of the Purdue University Writing Lab, funded by the School of Liberal Arts at Purdue.
- ELEMENTS OF STYLE. "This book is intended for use in English courses in which the practice of composition is combined with the study of
literature. It aims to give in brief space the principal requirements of plain English style. It aims to lighten the task of
instructor and student by concentrating attention (in Chapters II and III) on a few essentials, the rules of usage and
principles of composition most commonly violated. The numbers of the sections may be used as references in correcting
manuscript." from the Introduction to William Stunk, The Elements of Style, Ithaca, N.Y.: Priv. print. [Geneva, N.Y.: Press of W.P. Humphrey], 1918.
- LINKS ON THE WEB TO CITING PRINT AND ELECTRONIC SOURCES
Citation styles availble on the World Wide Web prepared by Lamont Library Harvard University Reference Librarian: "It is important to remember that methods for citing electronically accessed information are still in a state of flux. Standards are just beginning to emerge and there is still considerable variation within any style. However, there does not appear to be consensus that traditional citation information, as well as some information unique to electronic formats should be included. The path of access (usually the Universal Resource Locator or URL) and the dat of access are found in all styles. Often, but not always, the mode of access or electronic format is also included (CD-ROM, WWW site, Commercial database, etc.) What is important is that you are consistant throughout your paper in how the citations are presented and what information they include. Remember, the whole concept of citations is to help your reader identify and retrieve the same material you used."
.
- HARVARD GUIDE TO WRITING WITH SOURCES This guide is designed for Harvard students enrolled in Expository Writing, a required writing course for all in-coming students. It is recommended to students that this booklet be "consulted as necessary when you write papers or do other assignments using sources. Some students will have been trained in writing with sources before coming to [the University]; others will have had little or no training. The booklet aims to help both groups. Without a grasp of the information it contains, you risk taking valuable time away from the creative process of writing a paper and in certain circumstances could face disciplinary action. Even if you believe you already understand when and how to cite sources, you should compare your understanding with the instructions that follow. Your [Writing] instructor will supplement them with examples and exercises. Don't hesitate to ask about rules or situations that are unclear to you, since they may come up again in other classes or in the rumored life [to come] after [college]." from the Preface to WRITING WITH SOURCES: A Guide for Harvard Students, by Gordon Harvey, Expository Writing Program, Copyright 1995, The President and Fellows of Harvard University
- RESEARCH PAPERS ON THE INTERNET: THE BERKMAN DECISION. On September 27, 1998, Maria Morgan, a first-year student at the University, downloaded a free paper on 19701s pop culture off the Instant Term Papers (ITP) site on the World Wide Web, made a few minor stylistic changes, and turned it in for credit in her American Culture class. She did not cite ITP as a source for "her" paper, and did not tell her professor that she had downloaded the paper off the Internet. Ms. Morgan1s perfidy would likely have gone unnoticed had the University not performed a search of student computers to check if students were accessing Web sites that offer term papers, including the ITP site. This search indicated that Ms. Morgan had accessed the ITP site. At school disciplinary hearings, Ms. Morgan identified the ITP Web site as the source of her paper. The disciplinary board suspended her from school for one year. The Internet presents a new paradigm that often challenges our existing modes of operation. One of the perils introduced by the Internet is the immediate accessibility of research papers that are available on the web. The Internet provides instant, easy, inexpensive access to thousands of packaged, pre-written papers that students can use as a substitute for their own work. According to the findings of the Berkman legislature, this vast new opportunity for plagiarism has cast its spell on students who previously did not succumb to such temptation. In response, the Berkman Legislature enacted the EDUCATIONAL HONESTY ACT to prevent the increasing incidence of plagiarism over the Internet. (See also the ARTICLE FROM THE BERKMAN CITY PRESS. In order to achieve its purpose, the act targets the student plagiarists and the organizations that sell to them. It is the viability of this latter feature that we must decide today. Using the private right of action granted in the Act, Berkman University sued Instant Term Papers (ITP) for distributing a paper with knowledge that it might be represented as original work. ITP has countered that the Act is overbroad, restricts the distribution of scholarly research over the Internet, and thus violates the first amendment. Read THE ARGUMENT OF THE DEFENSE. Maria Morgan [sued] Berkman University for suspending her for one year for an act of plagiarism, [claiming] that the school violated her fourth amendment right to privacy by "spying" on her Internet use. Read the OPINION OF THE LOWER COURT. Then read the TRANSCRIPT OF THE TRIAL and the OPINION OF THE APPEALS COURT.
- HOW TO AVOID HIGH-RISK SITUATIONS. "Students who misuse sources usually don't set out to; they usually plan to write a thoughtful paper that displays their
own thinking. But they allow themselves to slip into a situation in which they either misuse sources out of negligence or
come to believe that they have no choice but to misuse sources. Here are some suggestions for avoiding such
situations. . . . " - from Chapter Three of WRITING WITH SOURCES: A Guide for Harvard Students, by Gordon Harvey, Expository Writing Program, Copyright 1995, The President and Fellows of Harvard University
|
[PHIL S-7]
[Syllabus]
[Handouts]
[Home]
[Bio]
[CV]
[PHIL DEPT.]
[E-MAIL]
Send comments to: Andreas Teuberr
URL: http://phils7.dce.harvard.edu/
Last Modified: 03/26/02
Instructor's Toolkit
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College
|